Sanford Signs Cut Both Ways
Remember those spray-painted “Sanford for Congress” signs? The ones touting his “fYou must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.
Remember those spray-painted “Sanford for Congress” signs? The ones touting his “fYou must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.
22 comments
Let’s see what Big T finds wrong with this article.
Let’s see what Big T finds wrong with this article.
When I saw Sanford’s plywood signs my first thought was someone could really have fun with that…….LOVE IT.
When I saw Sanford’s plywood signs my first thought was someone could really have fun with that…….LOVE IT.
Saying someone was “almost impeached” is like saying someone is almost a drug addict or almost a liberal or almost good looking. There’s zero significance in that statement.
Perhaps “almost impeached but the quid pro quo politicos eventually just censored him”
Oops, make that censured rather than censored.
Saying someone was “almost impeached” is like saying someone is almost a drug addict or almost a liberal or almost good looking. There’s zero significance in that statement.
Perhaps “almost impeached but the quid pro quo politicos eventually just censored him”
Oops, make that censured rather than censored.
Here’s some rationale: My signs are plywood so I can save my money for airfare to Argentina!
My signs are old plywood so my ex-wife won’t pester me for alimony, child support, and college tuition.
My signs are used plywood because I’m still paying off Maria Belen’s engagement ring.
Last one is a joke….pretty sure he paid more for spray paint than he did the ring.How much is a box of Cracker Jacks?
Or maybe, Chapur isn’t seen in SC because Sanford doesn’t want Jenny to catch wind of the SIZE of the diamond he let his soul-mate KEEP!
Here’s some rationale: My signs are plywood so I can save my money for airfare to Argentina!
My signs are old plywood so my ex-wife won’t pester me for alimony, child support, and college tuition.
My signs are used plywood because I’m still paying off Maria Belen’s engagement ring.
Last one is a joke….pretty sure he paid more for spray paint than he did the ring.How much is a box of Cracker Jacks?
Or maybe, Chapur isn’t seen in SC because Sanford doesn’t want Jenny to catch wind of the SIZE of the diamond he let his soul-mate KEEP!
http://westashley.patch.com/articles/sc1-kuhn-apologizes-to-teddy-turner-sort-of#youtube_video-13638692
“Kuhn apologizes to Turner” — the demolition derby continues.
http://westashley.patch.com/articles/sc1-kuhn-apologizes-to-teddy-turner-sort-of#youtube_video-13638692
“Kuhn apologizes to Turner” — the demolition derby continues.
I would do that myself, if I lived in the district. Hell, I’d place the signs next to his signs!
I would do that myself, if I lived in the district. Hell, I’d place the signs next to his signs!
sanford must answer questions AND followup questions as to a huge fine for traveling all over at taxpayer expense, and the recklessness of ditching his security detail responsible for his personal safety and [inexcusable, troubling] not answering 15 calls to his cell phone from his chief of staff over days. sanford created a disturbing national news story when all he had to do was tell his people that he needed some time away from Columbia and not to call unless it was a state emergency and estimating when he expected to return to his responsibilities. it is no one’s business about infidelity – but there are no second chances when someone sought, and was entrusted with, great public responsibility… and then shows a lack of judgment and ability to foresee the consequences – and unintended consequences – of an abrupt, impulsive act. my enthusiasm for mark sanford, i sadly realized, was for the husband with a beautiful family of 4 boys…for the whole package, NOT for him without his wife and sons. and not for a public figure who couldn’t compose his thoughts and comport himself better in his rush to get ahead of the news story. a second chance for love and marriage? of course. for his series of alarming decisions that created “Breaking News” that embarrassed a nation for his wife and children? no.
sanford must answer questions AND followup questions as to a huge fine for traveling all over at taxpayer expense, and the recklessness of ditching his security detail responsible for his personal safety and [inexcusable, troubling] not answering 15 calls to his cell phone from his chief of staff over days. sanford created a disturbing national news story when all he had to do was tell his people that he needed some time away from Columbia and not to call unless it was a state emergency and estimating when he expected to return to his responsibilities. it is no one’s business about infidelity – but there are no second chances when someone sought, and was entrusted with, great public responsibility… and then shows a lack of judgment and ability to foresee the consequences – and unintended consequences – of an abrupt, impulsive act. my enthusiasm for mark sanford, i sadly realized, was for the husband with a beautiful family of 4 boys…for the whole package, NOT for him without his wife and sons. and not for a public figure who couldn’t compose his thoughts and comport himself better in his rush to get ahead of the news story. a second chance for love and marriage? of course. for his series of alarming decisions that created “Breaking News” that embarrassed a nation for his wife and children? no.