Dear Editor:
I read your disgusting “article” “Holy City Sex Scandal” and I was appalled! Your little rag has no right to out a legislator when her sexual orientation, her previous marriage or her current relationship is not affecting her representation of her constituents, IT’S NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS.
But you would rather try to create some controversy and notoriety for your pathetic little blog by attempting to embarrass and marginalize a public servant based on her sexual orientation. How repellant!
You must be a vile, vulgar, unloved, unfriendly, ill-educated, backwards, backwoods, repulsive & repugnant, sad & pathetic “human being.”
Your transparent attempt to hurt Ms. Condon failed, your story was incorrect, you didn’t check your facts and you didn’t contact Ms. Condon to verify any of this – all you’ve managed to do is expose yourself as the hateful, ignorant, bigoted bag of bile that you are! Shame on you!!
(This is a letter to the editor from a FITS reader. It does not necessarily reflect the editorial position of FITSNews.com. To submit your letter for consideration – anonymously or otherwise – click here).
***
78 comments
That’s about right.
That’s about right.
Mr. Euler is right, that was a dumb and pointless article you posted about Ms Condon. Don’t you have real issues to report on?
Since we’re down in the mud, Will, how ’bout a report on the scent of Nikki’s pussy, or how she comes? Oops, that’s verboten. Let’s pick on the “queers.”
Mr. Euler is right, that was a dumb and pointless article you posted about Ms Condon. Don’t you have real issues to report on?
Since we’re down in the mud, Will, how ’bout a report on the scent of Nikki’s pussy, or how she comes? Oops, that’s verboten. Let’s pick on the “queers.”
Yeppers.The woman is a homosexual.
the females are often called,’dykes’ and are far more dangerous than their male counterparts;queers/fags/whatever,etc.Fits will have less trouble w/the male of the species,BECAUSE he IS a male; they’re more interested in his trouser sausage than politics…,and they ‘suck’…-this is often used as an insult,but when’s the last time you were getting a BJ,and told the person between your legs,’You Suck’?
Sure,you might say,’suck it harder baby,put a spit-shine on that purple knob’,but you don’t want to insult someone who has your life in their mouth,so to speak;assuming they have teeth and all-THOUGH, a velveteen rub can be ecstasy…
Velveteen Rub-When a woman with dentures removes the dentures to perform oral sex on a man. AKA a gum job or gummer.
example-
‘That trailer trash skank I hooked up with last night popped her dentures out and gave me a velveteen rub!’
Yeppers.The woman is a homosexual.
the females are often called,’dykes’ and are far more dangerous than their male counterparts;queers/fags/whatever,etc.Fits will have less trouble w/the male of the species,BECAUSE he IS a male; they’re more interested in his trouser sausage than politics…,and they ‘suck’…-this is often used as an insult,but when’s the last time you were getting a BJ,and told the person between your legs,’You Suck’?
Sure,you might say,’suck it harder baby,put a spit-shine on that purple knob’,but you don’t want to insult someone who has your life in their mouth,so to speak;assuming they have teeth and all-THOUGH, a velveteen rub can be ecstasy…
Velveteen Rub-When a woman with dentures removes the dentures to perform oral sex on a man. AKA a gum job or gummer.
example-
‘That trailer trash skank I hooked up with last night popped her dentures out and gave me a velveteen rub!’
Dang. Somebody is in a bad mood.
Dang. Somebody is in a bad mood.
I read the FITS post and the newspaper article to an out-of-state friend.
Her reaction: “No wonder South Carolina is in a time warp. Who cares who’s gay any more?”
And, “Does FITS ‘out’ folks who are . . . vegetarians?”
I read the FITS post and the newspaper article to an out-of-state friend.
Her reaction: “No wonder South Carolina is in a time warp. Who cares who’s gay any more?”
And, “Does FITS ‘out’ folks who are . . . vegetarians?”
Wow, Fits, the writer has good points about this being none of your business. But 11 adjectives describing your human being status must be close to a record. Nice job, letter writer.
Wow, Fits, the writer has good points about this being none of your business. But 11 adjectives describing your human being status must be close to a record. Nice job, letter writer.
you wanna call that ax wound a vagina instead of a bag of bile,so what?
you wanna call that ax wound a vagina instead of a bag of bile,so what?
It was not Sic’s shining moment.
Typical Fits — all sizzle and no steak. Sic outs ’em all except those that feed him. He is a media whore with the best of ’em. His tank is about empty trying to peddle this new cheap-o Dollar General DISQUS site with the mauve/dusty rose banner.
It was not Sic’s shining moment.
Typical Fits — all sizzle and no steak. Sic outs ’em all except those that feed him. He is a media whore with the best of ’em. His tank is about empty trying to peddle this new cheap-o Dollar General DISQUS site with the mauve/dusty rose banner.
Damn sic. I know over the years I’ve told you to ESAD, and maybe called you an asshole, but this dude just took it up a notch.
Damn sic. I know over the years I’ve told you to ESAD, and maybe called you an asshole, but this dude just took it up a notch.
I though Fits was a “libertarian?”Hahahahahaha!
Libertarians, particularly the Pauls, ALWAYS want to tell women what to do with their bodies.
And, some people wonder why more women aren’t Libertarian. Well, it’s because most are just not that stupid.
Fits isnt really a libertarian anyway.He is just a standard Right Wing Republican who enjoys needling people ,while mouthing off libertarian code words,ie “liberty”, “freedom” free enterprise”etc. etc.
And like many so called “libertarians”,hes all for it!Unless ,of course,its someone elses “freedom” that he disagrees with!
Hes sort of in the same camp with Glenn Beck.I notice that clown is now calling himself a “libertarian.”Seems the word has now been coopted by a bunch of Right Wingers who ,for some reason,dont want to admit what they really are-REPUBLICANS!
I though Fits was a “libertarian?”Hahahahahaha!
Libertarians, particularly the Pauls, ALWAYS want to tell women what to do with their bodies.
And, some people wonder why more women aren’t Libertarian. Well, it’s because most are just not that stupid.
Fits isnt really a libertarian anyway.He is just a standard Right Wing Republican who enjoys needling people ,while mouthing off libertarian code words,ie “liberty”, “freedom” free enterprise”etc. etc.
And like many so called “libertarians”,hes all for it!Unless ,of course,its someone elses “freedom” that he disagrees with!
Hes sort of in the same camp with Glenn Beck.I notice that clown is now calling himself a “libertarian.”Seems the word has now been coopted by a bunch of Right Wingers who ,for some reason,dont want to admit what they really are-REPUBLICANS!
Beginning to think this Euler fucker is either Ms. Condon’s Gynecologist or Proctologist.
Ain’t no way anyone could get that bent out of shape unless his head is either up Ms. Condon’s ass or pussy on a regular basis.
As for fitsnews “having no right to out a legislator” FuckFace Euler may want to reassess his quicksand position.
First, Ms. Condon ain’t no goddamn cockroach Legislator. She is on fucking Charleston County Council.
Second, the Constitution applies to fitsnews as much as it does to Fuckface Euler and his email resulting in this story being posted.
As for willie being “a vile, vulgar, unloved, unfriendly, ill-educated, backwards, backwoods, repulsive & repugnant, sad & pathetic “human being.” it is obvious that FuckFace Euler has a lot of experience in describing what he sees in his bathroom mirror every morning.
Local council enacts local laws, called ordinances, aka legislation. They
are legislators. Here is just one reference you can use to educate yourself on the facts of what local legislators do and how they do it:
http://www.sccounties.org/Data/Sites/1/media/publications/sccountieshndbk2012.pdf
Picking a position and making emotionally baseless assertions to support that position, is why people are so misled into following groups. Instead of recognizing our inherent tendency to be ‘swayed’ with emotion, we vigorously protect our own prejudice and bias by ignoring facts, not bothering to seek any, and attack any position that opposes our own prejudice, with unfounded emotional assertions. This is where bigotry, hatred, and other human foibles live, grow, and flourish.
Jesus Christ does every damn story on the Holy City have to bring out every Demonized Sons of Bitches in the state.
A state law is passed by state legislature comprised of LEGISLATORS, approved by the Governor and is effective in the goddamn mother fucking ENTIRE STATE.
A county/city ordinance is passed by county/city council comprised of councilpersons, got to be PC, and is effective only within the county/city. Usually ordinances can only define misdemeanors while state laws may create felonies.
Murder is a felony prohibited in the entire state, while driving South on Ashley Avenue is not only stupid it is a fucking misdemeanor applicable only in the county/city.
With your fucking logic if I happen to attend the local Catholic Church then I can call myself the fucking Pope.
As for the “foibles” comment I don’t have that problem but I do have a rash on my ass if you would like to stop by and put some cream on it.
Fucking moron
Voila – Emotionally defensive attack under which emotional attacker doesn’t bother supporting position with a reference that explains your assertion that members of a legislative body, the county council, don’t meet Blacks law definition (and websters, etc.) of legislators. Certainly you have an emotional defense why you think only members of the state ‘legislature’ can be ‘legislators’. I’m sure you believe no BLEEPBLEEP way are you confusing the meaning of these two words. Engaging in dialogue about a personal opinion that someone so desperately defends with attacks a waste of my time. Although I’m sure you’ll enjoy writing more of the same.
What is LEGISLATOR?
One who makes laws; a member of a LEGISLATIVE body.
What is LEGISLATIVE?
Making or giving laws; pertaining to the function of law-making or to the process of ENACTMENT of laws.
What is ENACTMENT?
The act of passing an rule or statute by a LEGISLATURE..
What is LEGISLATURE?
The department, assembly, or body of men that makes laws for a state or nation; a LEGISLATIVE body.
All of the above are from the pages of the Law Dictionary featuring Black’s Law Dictionary.
Now, moron if you are capable of following the yellow brick road you will find that there is no mention of county/city councils
http://thelawdictionary.org/legislator/
Good, now we’ve got a meaningful debate, application of logic to real references.
Your conclusion is based on a common error in logic. To understand and refute with reason, you’ll have to dig into what’s below. My apologies in advance if any is not clear.
Logic 101 – It is beneficial to understand the term ‘Object’. The word ‘legislator’ is an object in this discussion. “Object” could be an event, issue, item, piece of data, single thing (a shirt), a type of something (weather), etc. Objects can be organized by group, or by individual miniscule item. Every object is a member of a class. For instance, the object shirts is a member of the class clothing. The object Green M&M’s are members of the M&M class.
Objects are made unique with qualifiers. For instance, in the class of clothing, objects are items of clothing, qualifier is for which part of body. shirt is unique from pants. In the M&M class, color is the unique qualifier.
Here is where you made the common mistake.
It is true all legislators are members of some legislative body.
It is true the legislative body to which state legislators belong, is uniquely named legislature (forget federal for a moment).
It is FALSE that the only member of the general class Legislative Body is a unique object Legislature.
You inverted the definition of legislature.
Legislature (unique qualifier of object legislators )= state (here’s the qualifier) legislators who are members of a (here’s the class) legislative body
DOES NOT MEAN
Legislative body (Class) = only has the unique object legislature in it.
That’s like saying this definition
shirts = material worn on the upper body (qualifier), clothing (class)
Is the same as this:
clothing (class) = only the unique object shirt
!!!!!!!!!!!!
well done…the poster of this appears to have interesting sense of humor that is sometimes hidden behind attacks in your other posts. I’m not saying you care, i’m just saying what I think. I hope you will do more of the same (interesting pictures that can exactly communicate your position). Maybe you’ll start a trend.
Beginning to think this Euler fucker is either Ms. Condon’s Gynecologist or Proctologist.
Ain’t no way anyone could get that bent out of shape unless his head is either up Ms. Condon’s ass or pussy on a regular basis.
As for fitsnews “having no right to out a legislator” FuckFace Euler may want to reassess his quicksand position.
First, Ms. Condon ain’t no goddamn cockroach Legislator. She is on fucking Charleston County Council.
Second, the Constitution applies to fitsnews as much as it does to Fuckface Euler and his email resulting in this story being posted.
As for willie being “a vile, vulgar, unloved, unfriendly, ill-educated, backwards, backwoods, repulsive & repugnant, sad & pathetic “human being.” it is obvious that FuckFace Euler has a lot of experience in describing what he sees in his bathroom mirror every morning.
Local council enacts local laws, called ordinances, aka legislation. They
are legislators. Here is just one reference you can use to educate yourself on the facts of what local legislators do and how they do it:
http://www.sccounties.org/Data/Sites/1/media/publications/sccountieshndbk2012.pdf
Picking a position and making emotionally baseless assertions to support that position, is why people are so misled into following groups. Instead of recognizing our inherent tendency to be ‘swayed’ with emotion, we vigorously protect our own prejudice and bias by ignoring facts, not bothering to seek any, and attack any position that opposes our own prejudice, with unfounded emotional assertions. This is where bigotry, hatred, and other human foibles live, grow, and flourish.
Jesus Christ does every damn story on the Holy City have to bring out every Demonized Sons of Bitches in the state.
A state law is passed by state legislature comprised of LEGISLATORS, approved by the Governor and is effective in the goddamn mother fucking ENTIRE STATE.
A county/city ordinance is passed by county/city council comprised of councilpersons, got to be PC, and is effective only within the county/city. Usually ordinances can only define misdemeanors while state laws may create felonies.
Murder is a felony prohibited in the entire state, while driving South on Ashley Avenue is not only stupid it is a fucking misdemeanor applicable only in the county/city.
With your fucking logic if I happen to attend the local Catholic Church then I can call myself the fucking Pope.
As for the “foibles” comment I don’t have that problem but I do have a rash on my ass if you would like to stop by and put some cream on it.
Fucking moron
Voila – Emotionally defensive attack under which emotional attacker doesn’t bother supporting position with a reference that explains your assertion that members of a legislative body, the county council, don’t meet Blacks law definition (and websters, etc.) of legislators. Certainly you have an emotional defense why you think only members of the state ‘legislature’ can be ‘legislators’. I’m sure you believe no BLEEPBLEEP way are you confusing the meaning of these two words. Engaging in dialogue about a personal opinion that someone so desperately defends with attacks a waste of my time. Although I’m sure you’ll enjoy writing more of the same.
What is LEGISLATOR?
One who makes laws; a member of a LEGISLATIVE body.
What is LEGISLATIVE?
Making or giving laws; pertaining to the function of law-making or to the process of ENACTMENT of laws.
What is ENACTMENT?
The act of passing an rule or statute by a LEGISLATURE..
What is LEGISLATURE?
The department, assembly, or body of men that makes laws for a state or nation; a LEGISLATIVE body.
All of the above are from the pages of the Law Dictionary featuring Black’s Law Dictionary.
Now, moron if you are capable of following the yellow brick road you will find that there is no mention of county/city councils
http://thelawdictionary.org/legislator/
Good, now we’ve got a meaningful debate, application of logic to real references.
Your conclusion is based on a common error in logic. To understand and refute with reason, you’ll have to dig into what’s below. My apologies in advance if any is not clear.
Logic 101 – It is beneficial to understand the term ‘Object’. The word ‘legislator’ is an object in this discussion. “Object” could be an event, issue, item, piece of data, single thing (a shirt), a type of something (weather), etc. Objects can be organized by group, or by individual miniscule item. Every object is a member of a class. For instance, the object shirts is a member of the class clothing. The object Green M&M’s are members of the M&M class.
Objects are made unique with qualifiers. For instance, in the class of clothing, objects are items of clothing, qualifier is for which part of body. shirt is unique from pants. In the M&M class, color is the unique qualifier.
Here is where you made the common mistake.
It is true all legislators are members of some legislative body.
It is true the legislative body to which state legislators belong, is uniquely named legislature (forget federal for a moment).
It is FALSE that the only member of the general class Legislative Body is a unique object Legislature.
You inverted the definition of legislature.
Legislature (unique qualifier of object legislators )= state (here’s the qualifier) legislators who are members of a (here’s the class) legislative body
DOES NOT MEAN
Legislative body (Class) = only has the unique object legislature in it.
That’s like saying this definition
shirts = material worn on the upper body (qualifier), clothing (class)
Is the same as this:
clothing (class) = only the unique object shirt
!!!!!!!!!!!!
well done…the poster of this appears to have interesting sense of humor that is sometimes hidden behind attacks in your other posts. I’m not saying you care, i’m just saying what I think. I hope you will do more of the same (interesting pictures that can exactly communicate your position). Maybe you’ll start a trend.
Who the fk is fits??
Who the fk is fits??
Well Fits, you’ve obviously pissed off Mr. Euler, but that said, you’ve also given his displeasure more than adequate coverage. In addition to the above diatribe, he also has several comments posted on the original article.
I do think he over did the insults! A couple would have done the job, but given the coverage you’ve given him, he can’t call you a coward!
Well Fits, you’ve obviously pissed off Mr. Euler, but that said, you’ve also given his displeasure more than adequate coverage. In addition to the above diatribe, he also has several comments posted on the original article.
I do think he over did the insults! A couple would have done the job, but given the coverage you’ve given him, he can’t call you a coward!
Subject matter aside, Euler dude loses.
Why? This is the kind of letter that gets read and commented on. Which means FITS website gets hits. Which means FITS gets paid more.
So what this Euler dudette has done by sending his funny email and letting it get posted is give FITS a raise.
Fits is thanking Jackie while he is at the bank cashing his checks.
Subject matter aside, Euler dude loses.
Why? This is the kind of letter that gets read and commented on. Which means FITS website gets hits. Which means FITS gets paid more.
So what this Euler dudette has done by sending his funny email and letting it get posted is give FITS a raise.
Fits is thanking Jackie while he is at the bank cashing his checks.
A. Reason FITS pieces are garbage/sewage and can’t pass for news:
Writers don’t know or understand minimum standards of real investigative journalism.
http://www.spj.org/ethics.asp
http://www.ire.org/
B. FITS gets readership because:
1) Most readers don’t understand or care to read critically. Most read to justify their feelings.
2) Pieces don’t present any facts that can contradict emotional bias of uncritical readers. LOTS of opportunity for readers use ‘group bash’ to meet deep need to feel superior. I belong to group A, it’s better than group B.
3) This forum isn’t moderated. Angry denial of group bash (emotion always good to skew reasoning. Make sure personal foul attacks are added) I’m not saying a group A person is better than a group B person, you BLEEPBLEEP$$#####!!!!! Ummmm…yes you are. Group A can’t be ‘better’ unless constituent parts (members) are. Bigotry and prejudice take hold when undisciplined minds succumb to group bash. Vile, hateful attacks, and ridiculous explicit sexual descriptions posted under the pretense of group think are allowed, and encouraged. Uncritical readers don’t care these posts aren’t related to news.
4) No competition for the type of pieces (uninformed, unfounded, gossipy)
5) Like smoke to fire, under FITS trash tidbits of truth may hide. I abhor FITS trash and theBut I might find a tidbit to follow with real investigation. I also keep hoping of finding a reader with whom I can conduct thoughtful, reasoned dialogue about different perspectives on real data (laws/government procedures policies/documented conduct of public officials). Hasn’t happened yet.
For someone who thinks “FITS pieces are garbage/sewage and can’t pass for news,” you sure seem to read and comment on a lot of them. What does that make you? A consumer of garbage/sewage, I guess.
I guess you missed point number 5 as to why I am on this website. If you read carefully, you can see it has more to do with what’s not on the site, than what is.It is a point of view that investigators that comb through garbage for clues could be said to ‘consume’ it. Depends on your definition of ‘consume’.
Ah, I see: “I also keep hoping of finding a reader with whom I can conduct
thoughtful, reasoned dialogue about different perspectives on real data
(laws/government procedures policies/documented conduct of public
officials).”
If you’d like to find that person, may I remind you that succinctness is a virtue. If you prattle on too long, no one will take you seriously here, even the “geeks.”
okay don’t mean to say what your are saying is incorrect Please thumbs up for adding a different point of view that has rational foundation without resorting to foul language hostility. Your view is 100% accurate from your vantage and can’t possibly be refuted. One who reads these postings is a ‘consumer’. Of course I can be considered a consumer of garbage/sewage. That is not what I think of course, but your conclusion CAN’t BE REFUTED. I CONSUME FITS articles by reading, hence it is true I am a consumer. Standing on emotional defense that I AM NOT would be divisively defensive. As I know why I read FITS, I don’t have to defend.
Are you way over thinking this?
Outside of my colleagues in science/tech community, I’ve heard this before. Again it depends on what ‘under’ ‘over’ and ‘on the line’ thinking means. Analyzing everything is as natural as breathing. Big Bang show – dead on the way we communicate. For instance, a word has a literal definition, a connotation, and a denotation. I seek the other person’s view of the word so we have common understanding. Also most people don’t know, or care, or follow, specific principles of logic. A = B, B = C, A = C is transitive. A like B, B like C, can’t conclude A is like C, another principle, don’t remember. Nerds drive by a construction site and argue about how this item was moved to that place, other people say who the heck cares you weirdos?? We think stuff nobody else cares about is cool or interesting.
. You, normal – one sentence. Me, geek – big blob of words.
Say what now?
A. Reason FITS pieces can’t pass for news:
Writers don’t know or understand minimum standards of real investigative journalism.
http://www.spj.org/ethics.asp
http://www.ire.org/
B. FITS gets readership because:
1) Most readers don’t understand or care to read critically. Most read to justify their feelings.
2) Pieces don’t present any facts that can contradict emotional bias of uncritical readers. LOTS of opportunity for readers use ‘group bash’ to meet deep need to feel superior. I belong to group A, it’s better than group B.
3) This forum isn’t moderated. Angry denial of group bash (emotion always good to skew reasoning. Make sure personal foul attacks are added) I’m not saying a group A person is better than a group B person, you BLEEPBLEEP$$#####!!!!! Ummmm…yes you are. Group A can’t be ‘better’ unless constituent parts (members) are. Bigotry and prejudice take hold when undisciplined minds succumb to group bash. Vile, hateful attacks, and ridiculous explicit sexual descriptions posted under the pretense of group think are allowed, and encouraged. Uncritical readers don’t care these posts aren’t related to news.
4) No competition for the type of pieces (uninformed, unfounded, gossipy)
5) Like smoke to fire, under FITS nonsense tidbits of truth may hide.
For someone who thinks “FITS pieces are garbage/sewage and can’t pass for news,” you sure seem to read and comment on a lot of them. What does that make you? A consumer of garbage/sewage, I guess.
I guess you missed point number 5 as to why I am on this website. If you read carefully, you can see it has more to do with what’s not on the site, than what is.It is a point of view that investigators that comb through garbage for clues could be said to ‘consume’ it. Depends on your definition of ‘consume’.
Ah, I see: “I also keep hoping of finding a reader with whom I can conduct
thoughtful, reasoned dialogue about different perspectives on real data
(laws/government procedures policies/documented conduct of public
officials).”
If you’d like to find that person, may I remind you that succinctness is a virtue. If you prattle on too long, no one will take you seriously here, even the “geeks.”
okay don’t mean to say what your are saying is incorrect Please thumbs up for adding a different point of view that has rational foundation without resorting to foul language hostility. Your view is 100% accurate from your vantage and can’t possibly be refuted. One who reads these postings is a ‘consumer’. Of course I can be considered a consumer of garbage/sewage. That is not what I think of course, but your conclusion CAN’t BE REFUTED. I CONSUME FITS articles by reading, hence it is true I am a consumer. Standing on emotional defense that I AM NOT would be divisively defensive. As I know why I read FITS, I don’t have to defend.
Are you way over thinking this?
I’ve heard this before. Could be true, depends on what ‘under’ ‘over’ and ‘on the line’ thinking means. Analyzing everything is as natural as breathing. Big Bang show – dead on the way some people communicate. It’s just a matter of perspective.
Say what now?
Will you people please leave Sic Willie alone! He has told you over and over that he has no problem with a person’s sexual orientation. I guess that is why he brings their orientation up over and over.
excellent observation!!
Will you people please leave Sic Willie alone! He has told you over and over that he has no problem with a person’s sexual orientation. I guess that is why he brings their orientation up over and over.
excellent observation!!
The woman was a liar, cheater and a fraud. We have WAY too many Liars and frauds in office already…
Gays are BORN that way, so we’re told. It’s demaned we believe that or else. This woman swore before God (or that is commonly how it is done) she was in love w/ (attracted to) a MAN…How could that be??
She is a LIAR…and likely a cheat, too. Be honest…then let the chips fall…
Dishonesty is as big a problem as anything. Just look at what Obama said…then what he has done to our country…
The woman was a liar, cheater and a fraud. We have WAY too many Liars and frauds in office already…
Gays are BORN that way, so we’re told. It’s demaned we believe that or else. This woman swore before God (or that is commonly how it is done) she was in love w/ (attracted to) a MAN…How could that be??
She is a LIAR…and likely a cheat, too. Be honest…then let the chips fall…
Dishonesty is as big a problem as anything. Just look at what Obama said…then what he has done to our country…
@katlaurenscounty – It’s taken me 4 cups of coffee to get through both of these articles and posts. The 4th one brought me to the point of wondering what pillow talk would be like with you, and it would be no less than interesting.
@katlaurenscounty – It’s taken me 4 cups of coffee to get through both of these articles and posts. The 4th one brought me to the point of wondering what pillow talk would be like with you, and it would be no less than interesting.
Fitz News is just ignorant when it comes to Charleston politics. How many times has anyone from Fitz been to a Charleston County meeting? Not once. You aren’t even aware of the issues, and just make shit up. Stupid shit. Lets face it the journalism in SC is even worse than the politics. No wonder no once cares.
Fitz News is just ignorant when it comes to Charleston politics. How many times has anyone from Fitz been to a Charleston County meeting? Not once. You aren’t even aware of the issues, and just make shit up. Stupid shit. Lets face it the journalism in SC is even worse than the politics. No wonder no once cares.