SC

More Anemic “Income Tax Relief”

S.C. Rep. Tommy Stringer (R-Greenville) is a good guy … as far as we know, anyway. But his recYou must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

S.C. Rep. Tommy Stringer (R-Greenville) is a good guy … as far as we know, anyway. But his rec
You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

Related posts

SC

For Two Quiet Hours, Every Child Belonged at the South Carolina State Fair

Jenn Wood
SC

Parents Demand S.C. Charter Board Revoke School Operator’s Contract

Dylan Nolan
SC

Parents To Stage Walkout Of South Carolina Charter School

Dylan Nolan

10 comments

jimlewisowb February 12, 2013 at 7:45 pm

$86 bucks you say, a whoop ass $86

Gee let me see what I can get for my whoop ass $86

1 22oz. Coke per week for a whole year
or
21 1oz. tubes of Boudreaux Butt Paste
or
6 Trojan Duo Intense Stay Hard Cockring Vibrating Ring Kits, one for each member of Stringer’s Sub-Committee

Reply
jimlewisowb February 12, 2013 at 6:45 pm

$86 bucks you say, a whoop ass $86

Gee let me see what I can get for my whoop ass $86

1 22oz. Coke per week for a whole year
or
21 1oz. tubes of Boudreaux Butt Paste
or
6 Trojan Duo Intense Stay Hard Cockring Vibrating Ring Kits, one for each member of Stringer’s Sub-Committee

Reply
CNSYD February 12, 2013 at 8:00 pm

Typical “new math” from Sic Willie. In order to determine the highest “taxes” or “fees” or whatever the hell you want to call them between the states, you have to add up ALL of them. You can bet your ass that if a state has lower or even no income tax they are getting the funds some other way. At the end of the day it is the TOTAL you pay that counts.

Reply
sweepin February 12, 2013 at 9:12 pm

Reminds me of my Brother-in-Laws when property tax relief was the rage. When it was enacted they were giddy and breathless with joy. Only problem was the 400,000 sq. ft. of commercial real estate we owned. The result of our combined residential tax relief was less than half of the increase in our property tax increase on the commercial property.

Fits is almost as smart as they are. He thinks almost as deeply too.

Reply
CNSYD February 12, 2013 at 7:00 pm

Typical “new math” from Sic Willie. In order to determine the highest “taxes” or “fees” or whatever the hell you want to call them between the states, you have to add up ALL of them. You can bet your ass that if a state has lower or even no income tax they are getting the funds some other way. At the end of the day it is the TOTAL you pay that counts.

Reply
sweepin February 12, 2013 at 8:12 pm

Reminds me of my Brother-in-Laws when property tax relief was the rage. When it was enacted they were giddy and breathless with joy. Only problem was the 400,000 sq. ft. of commercial real estate we owned. The result of our combined residential tax relief was less than half of the increase in our property tax increase on the commercial property.

Fits is almost as smart as they are. He thinks almost as deeply too.

Reply
Finch February 14, 2013 at 1:37 am

Sic Willie data mines. Always use adblock plus here (keeps his spyware ads off your computer), never accept cookies from here (you can change them in your browser settings), And also know that Sic Willie turns over ip information to people, including Viers, even though there’s no law saying Sic Willie needs to be saving ip data. Be warned.

Reply
Finch February 14, 2013 at 12:37 am

Sic Willie data mines. Always use adblock plus here (keeps his spyware ads off your computer), never accept cookies from here (you can change them in your browser settings), And also know that Sic Willie turns over ip information to people, including Viers, even though there’s no law saying Sic Willie needs to be saving ip data. Be warned.

Reply
Joann Kaliesq Noonan February 17, 2013 at 6:52 pm

It is good in that it reduces the tax for those least able to pay it. Sales taxes should be reduced, too, while taxes on the wealthiest individuals and corporations should be increased and on luxury items. Corporations could reduce their taxes by spending the money on programs preparing people for jobs with said corporations, and then hiring those people.

Reply
Joann Noonan February 17, 2013 at 5:52 pm

It is good in that it reduces the tax for those least able to pay it. Sales taxes should be reduced, too, while taxes on the wealthiest individuals and corporations should be increased and on luxury items. Corporations could reduce their taxes by spending the money on programs preparing people for jobs with said corporations, and then hiring those people.

Reply

Leave a Comment