SC

SC Ethics Panel: Bigger Isn’t Better

LAWMAKERS EXPAND COMMITTEE THEY OUGHT TO BE ELIMINATING Leave it to South Carolina state government You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

sc-state-house-e1461266194497.jpg
LAWMAKERS EXPAND COMMITTEE THEY OUGHT TO BE ELIMINATING Leave it to South Carolina state government
You must Subscribe or log in to read the rest of this content.

Related posts

SC

North Charleston Councilman Accuses Cop Of Falsifying Police Report

Will Folks
SC

‘Carolina Crossroads’ Update: SCDOT Set To Unveil New Plan To The Public

Will Folks
SC

Federal Lawsuit Alleges Racial Discrimination in Horry County School

Callie Lyons

12 comments

43f0d257c8d02beadbb9e124a4d808e1?s=100&d=mm&r=r
Joe December 5, 2012 at 7:24 am

Isn’t bigger always better?

Reply
b86d0bedc75039fe8c64cafb95a552fb?s=100&d=mm&r=r
Sailor December 5, 2012 at 10:17 am

Nikki thinks so!

Reply
9ab8da91e13ca7c711ff9af48ab81722?s=100&d=mm&r=r
junior justice December 5, 2012 at 8:00 am

It’s easy – just hold your nose in the air and then follow the stink, the stink, the stink – (how many members on this panel?)

Reply
4f169eff2741e98f35c507ad2eb0cd01?s=100&d=mm&r=r
Johnson December 5, 2012 at 8:00 am

I disagree with you on this one, Willie. With a larger committee, there is a greater chance one of the members will have a ping of conscious and morality and act on it. It would be harder for one personality to dominate the final decision of the group. The most obvious analogy would be the present SC Supreme Court. Toal completely controls this court. Her judicial and attorney disciplinary system is more “known for its rigged hearings and hall passes” than these legislative committees could ever be. The SC Supreme Court needs at least 2 more members – and obviously 2 people who will stand up to Toal. It’s good to keep the conversation/debate going, but I disagree on this one.

Reply
53fb3fa454452eb7115a24bc808dbdaa?s=100&d=mm&r=r
commonman December 5, 2012 at 8:01 am

The General Assembly is a joke, ethics reform is a joke, and apparently we do not demand better from those we elect. They all talk a good game, but that is all it is. We deserve better, but we amble down the party paths and elect the best talkers with no backbone to stand up for any of us. Look at the salaries and perks they give themselves and their family members and their staffers. We are in trouble. And by the way,if the Republican Party had recognized Ron Paul for one night and allowed him the spotlight before fading into the sunset, Mitt Romney would be President now. There were a lot of Ron Paul supporters who took that as an insult. Romney had the opportunity, but chose not to do the appropriate thing.

Reply
955601cc5fdf6f0dafe27e855d40f239?s=100&d=mm&r=r
sweepin December 5, 2012 at 8:29 am

This Governor was ostensibly elected on “change.” Specifically, ethics reform, open government, efficient government.

SC is a legislative controlled state. Until the legislature is moved to make change it’s not going to happen. That can be done persuasively and with commonality of interest and goals, or persuasively with brute power and little commonality.

Haley had two choices to effect change:

1) Work cooperatively with the General Assmembly to find common ground among key members (read power centers) and bring about the reform. Instead, she chose to summarily poke them in the eye right out of the chute. She alienated not only leadership, but rank and file with her silly report cards and other grandstanding.

2) Co-opt the General Assmembly with an “end run” around them by applealing to the same enraged electorate that was ripe for the picking. Again, she couldn’t bring herself to muster the courage. One, she had no intention to walk the walk of ethics reform. Two, she has been much too busy preening for the national TV market via her appearances before think tanks, out of state campaigning, and kissing up to check writing special interest. Three, she has demonstrated her inability to be a chief executive.

The voters and the General Assembly recognize her for what she is: a complete imposter and fraud, an incompetent administrator, and one who has proven totally not fit for prime time.

She had set back any real chance of reform. Neither the GA nor the voters wish to empower her or any similarly ill-equipped future chief executive with real power..

Let the next purge begin in 2014. I don’t know how much more damage she can do than she has already done.

Reply
37058ae726dd9326277640a11490409a?s=100&d=mm&r=r
? December 5, 2012 at 9:52 am

“Co-opt the General Assmembly with an “end run” around them by applealing to the same enraged electorate that was ripe for the picking. ”

lol…yes but the mob is fickle…and more interestingly history shows us that when they are truly enraged pols swing from lamp posts, trees or are lined up @ guillotene’s.

That’s the beauty of “democracy”, it gives the mob an outlet(voting) that is not only mostly ineffective but allows the cockroaches to scurry away with their ill gotten gains with little chance of the above danger.

Reply
9ab8da91e13ca7c711ff9af48ab81722?s=100&d=mm&r=r
junior justice December 5, 2012 at 4:30 pm

A+

Reply
2f260e573552ea332fbf749db7eedfa7?s=100&d=mm&r=r
sam December 5, 2012 at 8:47 am

In a similar vein, inmates at the Broad River Correctional Facility have organized their first ever Iron Man Competition. To be known as the “DIG, SWIM and RUN” annual meet.

Reply
37058ae726dd9326277640a11490409a?s=100&d=mm&r=r
? December 5, 2012 at 9:53 am

Just think if we made the ethic panel as big as the general assembly! Boy, that would sure be effective.

LMAO!

Reply
118cf5f77c35cc26e24324f8b2618f55?s=100&d=mm&r=r
Andy December 5, 2012 at 5:45 pm

Who gives a shit about this anymore?

Reply
867668e89ed48ecc47e216856001ae59?s=100&d=mm&r=r
Patko December 6, 2012 at 6:18 am

Will, it’s a little hard for you to judge White and Harrel for disclosure when your Libertea won’t do it, don’t you think?

Reply

Leave a Comment